Who can AI actually see?

We ran 26 websites, from household names to small businesses and startups, through the Protony GEO Grader, the same tool on our home page. Each site's home page was fetched the way an AI crawler fetches it (server-rendered HTML, no JavaScript) and scored across six categories, 100 points total. Average score: 80. Only 9 earned an A.

96Highest: zendesk.com
51Lowest: carrd.co
8brands whose biggest gap is crawler access or a missing llms.txt
#SiteScoreGradeAI
/20
Structured
/20
Content
/20
Discoverability
/15
Authority
/15
Technical
/10
Biggest gap
1zendesk.com96A202020151110No author attribution
2atlassian.com95A202017131510Few question-style headings
3stripe.com93A202017151110No publication date
4klaviyo.com93A152020131510Blocks some AI crawlers
5wix.com92A20202015710No author attribution
6salesforce.com91A20172015118No author attribution
7hubspot.com90A20202013710No author or date signals
8asana.com90A202014151110No contact info on page
9webflow.com90A202017121110No publication date
10squarespace.com87B15202015710Blocks some AI crawlers
11intercom.com85B20201513710No question-style headings
12notion.so84B20201215710No question-style headings
13mailchimp.com81B20171215710No question-style headings
14slack.com77C20617131110No JSON-LD schema
15zoom.us76C101715131110No llms.txt
16dropbox.com75C20141212710No social metadata
17hellobonsai.com74C20171212310Weak authority signals
18monday.com73C1520912710Blocks some AI crawlers
19workday.com73C1020151576No llms.txt
20waveapps.com73C10171712710No llms.txt
21nike.com72C10151515710No llms.txt
22shopify.com71C2061715310No JSON-LD schema
23sendfox.com71C2061715310No JSON-LD schema
24jobber.com70C2061512710No JSON-LD schema
25gumroad.com64D203915710No JSON-LD schema
26carrd.co51F1001410710No schema, no llms.txt

Columns: AI crawler access /20, Structured data /20, Content structure /20, Discoverability /15, Authority signals /15, Technical health /10. Scores reflect the public home page on 2026-11-01 and change as sites change. Want your company added or re-scored? Ask us.

What the index says

Small businesses and startups score worst, and it is almost never on purpose. carrd.co (51), gumroad.com (64), jobber.com and sendfox.com all publish no JSON-LD schema, and carrd.co has no llms.txt either. Their pages read fine to a human and say almost nothing to a machine, so when a buyer asks an AI engine for a recommendation, a bigger competitor gets cited instead.

Blocking crawlers is the most expensive mistake. monday.com, squarespace.com and klaviyo.com all block at least one AI crawler, and carrd.co and waveapps.com are only partly open. Every one of them gives up points in the single category that decides whether an engine can read the site at all.

The leaders have boring fundamentals. zendesk.com, atlassian.com and stripe.com do nothing exotic. Full crawler access, complete schema, one H1, question-style headings, clean metadata. That is the whole playbook, and almost nobody runs all of it.

Everyone is missing the same easy points. No publication date and no named author show up in the top gap for a third of the index. These are afternoon fixes.

Method

Each home page was fetched once with a crawler user agent and no JavaScript execution, which is what most AI retrieval systems see. robots.txt and llms.txt were checked at the domain root. Scoring rules are published in What is GEO. Two brands we attempted (godaddy.com, servicenow.com) returned HTTP 403 to the crawler and were excluded rather than scored zero. The index is free to cite with a link to this page.

Can AI even see you?

The audit is free, takes about twelve seconds, and skips the sales pitch.

Run the free audit Talk to us